I am also guided by these comments of the author of The Doctrine of Res Judicata in Canada, 3d edition at p. 351: The traditional view of a consent judgment is that it is a judgment of the court, not an agreement between the parties to the proceeding, and it is enforceable in the same manner as if it had not been created by consent, but by the court on completion of a trial or hearing. It is to be regarded as a judgment after a hearing on the merits: Whitmell v. Ritchie, [2009] O.J. No. 2064 (Div. Ct.) at para. 42.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.