In considering the first question posed by the learned Chief Justice of Canada, namely what kind of evidence was obtained, and in considering his dicta on the matter of conscripted evidence, I do so in the context of the dicta enunciated in Stillman v. The Queen, 1997 CanLII 384 (SCC), 113 C.C.C. (3d) 321, where Cory, J. at page 350 noted, in writing on the distinction between conscripted and non-conscripted evidence: I have use the term "conscripted" to describe the situation where the police have compelled the accused to participate in providing self-incriminating evidence in the form of a confession or providing bodily samples.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.