Is there a strong case for compensatory support?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Doell v Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115 (CanLII):

There is not a strong case for compensatory support in this instance. Compensation is for losses caused by the marriage or breakup of the marriage which would not have been suffered otherwise: Chutter v. Chutter, 2008 BCCA 507 at para. 50.

Other Questions


If there are no compensatory grounds for support, what are the non-compensationary grounds? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in India considered the issue of non-compensation and compensatory support for the purposes of spousal support? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is spousal support calculated based on compensatory, contractual or non-compensatory considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a mother entitled to spousal support on both a compensatory and non-compensatory basis? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between the compensatory and non-compensatory aspects of spousal support? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to spousal support on a compensatory or non-compensatory basis? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where there is no expert evidence to support a claim of negligence? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any evidence to support a claim that there is no evidence supporting the existence of an underground mine? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the difference between compensatory and non-compensatory grounds for spousal support under the Divorce Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a spousal support award based on compensatory support? (British Columbia, Canada)