. . . In my judgment, companionship is not a recoverable head of damages because such damages must necessarily be for the loss of the life of the deceased. This distinction was well identified by Parrett J. in Loyie v. Erickson Estate [citation omitted] where that learned judge reviewed the authorities and decided at 37 that "it is the loss of the 'services' of the deceased rather than the loss of the deceased himself which provides the theoretical framework for this type of award."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.