The necessity criterion is flexible and includes many circumstances. When considering the necessity criteria in a co-conspiracy case, “[t]he issue is the availability of the testimony, not the availability of the witness”. (See R v. Pilarinos  B.C.J. No. 1324 at para 14.) As the following cases explain, the co-conspirator may be physically available but the testimony is rarely available.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.