British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from McLaren v. Little, 2006 BCSC 1746 (CanLII):
The governing principle on the concept of void for vagueness is taken from Vantreight v. Gray.[3] There, the easement contained the words "for right-of-way purposes". It was contended that those words were restricted to the access or egress from one piece of property through another piece of property. The court rejected that contention, and said, at paras. 5 and 6:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.