What is the CPA’s position on class actions?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v. Alberta, 2008 ABQB 490 (CanLII):

As stated in Ayrton v. PRL Financial (Alta.) Ltd., 2006 ABCA 88 at para. 14, 384 A.R. 1, the CPA “supports a purposive approach and provides for extensive flexibility in terms of procedures available to certification judges to deal with class actions as they unfold.”

The certification stage is not meant as a test of the merits of the action. The issue is not whether the claim is likely to succeed, but whether it is appropriately prosecuted as a class action: Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. 16, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158.

Other Questions


Can a party to an action extend the action by unilateral action, when nothing has been done to materially advance the action for five years or more? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between a class action and a representative action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the definition of a class action and what is the scope of the class? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for bringing a summary judgment application in a class action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an action under which an action cannot succeed? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a learned trial judge order that a constructive trust action be used in a divorce action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the meaning of intent without corresponding action in a divorce action? (Alberta, Canada)
Can events arising from a prior action be the foundation for a new action? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle in Sansalone in determining whether to certify a class action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining an amount received by reason of action against an employer as a result of action taken against it? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.