The claim for past loss of earnings during the period from the date of the accident to August 2016 depends on what the plaintiff would have earned had the accident not occurred. As set out in Grewal v. Naumann, 2017 BCCA 158, at paras. 43-48, this is a hypothetical event and, as such, need not be proven on a balance of probabilities. The plaintiff need only prove a real and substantial possibility, as opposed to mere speculation, that she would have earned income during this period if the accident had not occurred. The court must then assess the likelihood of that occurring.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.