Is a contempt proceeding, even one involving civil contempt as in the present case, quasi-criminal nature?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia v. Seattle Environmental Consulting Ltd., 2020 BCCA 365 (CanLII):

It is common ground that a contempt proceeding, even one involving civil contempt as in the present case, is quasi-criminal in nature, engaging the principles of fundamental justice and Charter protections. This is because civil contempt can attract criminal consequences, including a custodial sentence: Interfor v. Simm, 2000 BCCA 500 at para. 25.

Other Questions


What is the case law on the re-opening of a plaintiff’s case in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for contempt of court proceedings in civil cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a class proceeding be the basis for a legal proceeding if the claims presented in that proceeding cannot be sustained individually? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s. 11(c) of the Charter apply to a contemnor in a civil contempt proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found in contempt of court for breaching the terms of a civil contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the use of writ of sequestration in contempt proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law relevant to this proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a witness in a civil proceeding have absolute immunity from civil action at common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant time period when considering delay in a civil contempt proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.