What is the standard statement of marshalling and apportionment?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Virk v. Sangha, 2016 BCSC 924 (CanLII):

Turning now to the applications for marshalling, apportionment and subrogation. The classic statement of marshalling is set out in many cases. In CIBC v. Branch, 1999 CanLII 6394, Madam Justice Levine said:

Other Questions


What is the standard of review for a motion where the claim is based on a statement of the approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard for determining whether a statement or document is defamatory? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of conduct in a closing statement at a personal injury trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the significance of the relative standard of living of the parties post post post-war compared to the standard living standard in their respective countries? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current standard for determining if a motorist has acted accordance with the requisite standard? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim for breach of contract arising out of a statement in a property disclosure statement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current standard of review and the guidelines for applying that standard? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts treated the "patentently unreasonable standard" of standard of conduct in cases involving mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an occasion of qualified privilege where a statement was given to a person who had an interest or duty to make the statement? (British Columbia, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.