What is the test for a plaintiff who has not pursued a course of recommended treatment?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hauk v Shatzko, 2020 BCSC 344 (CanLII):
Where a plaintiff has not pursued a course of recommended treatment, the onus is on the defendant to prove that the plaintiff acted unreasonably: Chiu v. Chiu, 2002 BCCA 618 at para. 57.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for making an argument that a plaintiff has not pursued a course of recommended medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an argument that a plaintiff has not pursued a course of recommended medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff who has not pursued a course of medical treatment recommended to him by his doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to claim damages for not following a course of medical treatment recommended to her by her doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for failure to mitigate by not pursuing a recommended course of medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not followed a recommended course of medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff acted unreasonably by not pursuing a recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of not pursuing reasonable recommended courses of medical treatment on damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making an argument that a plaintiff has not followed a course of recommended medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for failure to mitigate in circumstances where a plaintiff has not pursued recommended medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
