What is the test for intentional unemployment?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Bishop v Wang, 2018 BCSC 781 (CanLII):
Bad faith, or an intention to avoid payment of child support is not required for a finding of intentional unemployment. There need only be a finding that the parent is not earning what they are capable of earning: Barker v. Barker, 2005 BCCA 177.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a party intentionally underemployed or unemployed intentionally imputing income under section 19(1)(a) of the Employment Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted "common intention" in the context of a common intention claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a finding of bad faith on the part of the spouse in a claim for imputation of income for intentional unemployment or under employment require bad faith? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income for intentional under employment or unemployment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a party’s intentions were in the context of their intentions in a personal relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is intent relevant to the meaning of the words "intention" in the context of a contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the law governing a variation in custody where the intention of the custodial parent to relocate was the intention to relocate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for malicious intent in the context of an appeal against the findings of a finding of malicious intent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income to a spouse intentionally under-employed or unemployed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding of intentional underemployment or unemployment for child support? (British Columbia, Canada)
