What factors will the court consider to vary a parent's access order?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Friedlander v. Claman, 2015 BCSC 2409 (CanLII):

In Pang v. Pang, 2013 ONSC 2564, Mr. Justice Price considered that the mother's repeated breaches of court orders amounted to a material change in circumstances that affected the child's interests to such a degree to justify varying the order. He identified the framework in paras. 19 and 20: 19 Past decisions of our courts have identified factors the court should consider when asked to vary an order for child custody or access. These include the pre-eminent responsibility of custodial parents to make decisions affecting a child, a child's need for stability during the turmoil that accompanies separation and divorce, and the need to manage conflict constructively between parents in order to minimize its negative impact on the child. 20 Abela, J.A. in MacGyver v. Richards, (1995), cautioned judges against allowing an access parent to interfere lightly with a custodial parent's responsibilities, to serve what is alleged to be the best interests of the child. She observed that, because what is in children's best interests may vary from child to child, and from time to time, and having regard to the difficulty of deciding, objectively, what is most likely to be conducive to a child's having the best opportunity to receive needed care and attention, it is important to minimize the prospects for stress and instability.

Price J. considered circumstances where parents were in prolonged conflict at para. 24: 24 Murray J., in Jackson v. Jackson, (1995), referred to the damage the parents in that case were doing to their children by their prolonged conflict: As with many parents in high conflict, they purport to wage war for the best interests of their children... The practical reality is that they have no apparent interest in curbing conflict to minimize the potential of harm to their children.

At para. 81, Price J. referred to the decision of Corbett J. in De Melo v. Gooding, 2010 ONSC 2271: 81 As Corbett J. noted in De Melo, the threshold requirement for a material change in circumstances is not intended to condemn the parties to a lengthy process of dispute resolution that holds no reasonable prospect of enabling them to resolve their differences: This is not to encourage interminable court attendances, or unending participation in formal dispute resolution outside the court process. There comes a point at which the frequency and intensity of conflict may warrant a change in the overall custody and access regime, in an effort to reduce that conflict. In other words, the failure of the processes established by the parties may, itself, be a material change of circumstances, just as the apparent inability of the parties to work with a specific parenting coordinator could justify changing the coordinator in Litman v. Sherman. [Emphasis added by Price J.]

Other Questions


What factors will the court consider when ordering a table amount for the purposes of an interim order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when considering retroactive variation of an interim child support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the consequence if one parent deliberately prevents the other parent from exercising parenting time as stipulated in a parenting order? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the court order that common sense be considered as a factor in determining future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the submission of the Respondent on an interim order to order a primary parent to continue as the primary parent of the child pending trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts in BC considered factors relevant to the consideration of the first factor in a plaintiff's refusal to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors must the court consider when determining whether to modify an interim spousal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors must be considered when dealing with whether children should be moved thereby necessitating changes in the access order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the court enforce a parenting order for parenting time on the basis of COVID-19? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.