Does a wrongful act, neglect or default that would have entitled the injured party to maintain an action and recover damages?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cable Estate v. Ferguson, 2008 ABQB 343 (CanLII):

This analysis also makes clear that “a wrongful act, neglect or default that would ... have entitled the injured party to maintain an action and recover damages” means a wrongful act that creates a right to an action and damages in court, not by some other means. The same conclusion was drawn by Belzil J. in Chochla v. Visa Truck Rentals (1991) Ltd., op cit at para. 35, though this judgment does not reference Cheeseman.

Other Questions


Can a party to an action extend the action by unilateral action, when nothing has been done to materially advance the action for five years or more? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a party who is not an applicant in a restrictive covenant action against a party that is not a party to the restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a tortfeasor have a right to recover damages from a third party who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the basis for the principle that a person who is not a party to the same type of accommodation as a party is entitled to a similar accommodation? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the principle of res judicata apply when one party has brought a new cause of action against the same party? (Alberta, Canada)
Are damages sufficient for Delta to recover damages? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the range of damages awarded to an injured party for failing to mitigate their injuries? (Alberta, Canada)
In a wrongful dismissal action, is income tax calculated as a factor in determining damages? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the damages for reduction in quality of life for an injured party? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff recover damages in an action of deceit? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.