What is the burden of establishing a Charter violation?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Hardenstine, 2010 BCSC 899 (CanLII):

It is trite law that an accused has the burden of establishing a Charter breach on a balance of probabilities. An accused asserting a Charter remedy bears both the initial burden of presenting evidence that his or her Charter rights or freedoms have been infringed or denied, and the ultimate burden of proving that there has been a Charter violation: Collins v. The Queen (1987), 1987 CanLII 84 (SCC), 33 C.C.C. (3d) 1. If the evidence is not persuasive either way, the court must conclude that Charter rights were not infringed: Collins p. 13-4.

Other Questions


How has evidence been excluded from a Charter violation trial where the Charter violation was a serious one? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a Charter voire dire to establish a breach of section 7 of the Charter? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for using s. 10(b) of the Charter to argue that the amended provisions in the Charter do not violate section 8(b)? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to establish a Charter violation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusion under s. 24(2) of the Charter when evidence is recovered after a Charter violation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing Charter breaches? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a section of the Constitution or the Charter has been breached? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper analytical framework to apply where a violation of s. 15 of the Charter is alleged? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that any one of the conditions is satisfied? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a Charter violation hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.