CBSG submits that each party should bear its own expenses incurred in this action on the grounds that: a) the allocation of litigation expenses is ultimately an issue for the discretion of the court. The court has a discretion to decline to enforce a contractual provision regarding costs. In support of this proposition it cites the decision of Steele, J. in Kentucky Fried Chicken v. Scott [1997] OJ 4451. It submits that this case does not justify one party bearing the expenses of another party, and b) the intent of the indemnity agreement was to reimburse A&P for expenses incurred as a result of the negligence of CBSG or those for whom it was responsible. In this case, the jury found that there was no such negligence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.