What is the leading case on causation in medical negligence cases?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Meyers v. Stanley, 2003 ABQB 468 (CanLII):
The leading case on causation in medical negligence cases is Snell v. Farrell 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311. It says that causation need not be determined by scientific precision. Often it is extremely difficult for the plaintiff to prove or the court determine the cause of the injury. Causation is essentially a practical question of fact which can best be answered by ordinary common sense rather than abstract metaphysical theory.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for negligence in a medical malpractice case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on causation in medical malpractice cases? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for negligent misrepresentation in the context of medical negligence claims? (Alberta, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, can a medical professional become an insurer? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation in medical malpractice cases? (Alberta, Canada)
Is it appropriate for a medical professional to be considered a non-treating physician in a medical malpractice case? (Alberta, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is a doctor permitted to refer to a patient’s medical chart containing information that is not relevant to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of causation in medical malpractice cases? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on case-by-case privilege? (Alberta, Canada)
Can allegations of systemic negligence be relevant to allegations of negligence in a particular case? (Alberta, Canada)
