What is the meaning of the third element of a restraining order?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Power v. Power, 2015 NSSC 258 (CanLII):
The third element was described in paragraph 35: “the party allegedly in breach must have intentionally done the act that the order prohibits or intentionally failed to do the act that the order compels”. It was the meaning of this third element that was at issue in Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 and which is at issue before me. I will address it in detail later in my reasons. Analysing the allegations
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for making an order for an order to remove a child from the custody of his mother? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the impact of a recent decision in a family law case in which a husband has been ordered to pay his ex-wife’s life insurance in order to get a beneficial interest in his life insurance policy? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Are there any cases where a court has found that a husband who has been ordered to pay a fine under an equalization order is a post-bankruptcy debt? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a tribunal order the payment of interest on a mortgage where the statute does not expressly authorize the order to do so? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a variation of an order where a party is seeking to change the existing order? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test to vary the current order under section 65 of the National Statutory Review Order? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
When will a court order joint ownership of a property? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the threshold requirement of material change for variation of an order for access to a child? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for having access to a child by a third party parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge order costs for work "thrown away" as a result of an adjournment granted on the first day of a trial? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
