Is a plaintiff entitled to a capital asset approach when there is no clear earnings history?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lamont v Prat, 2021 BCSC 1294 (CanLII):

The plaintiff submits that the capital asset approach should not be restricted to those cases where there is no clear earnings history. He submits that the overriding factor is whether the loss is not measurable in a pecuniary way: Dabu v. Schwab, 2016 BCSC 613 at para. 73.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a capital asset under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim for future income loss under an earnings approach or capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between the earnings approach and the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate approach when a plaintiff does not have a history of earnings or established career path? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a loss of capital asset as a result of her loss of future earning capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff fails to prove quantification of their loss by earnings or by capital asset, is that loss quantification quantified or quantified? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has impaired their earnings capacity or capital asset capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the "capital asset" approach to determining whether a plaintiff has been rendered less capable of earning income from all types of employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the capital asset approach when dealing with a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the capital asset approach to the loss of future earning capacity for a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.