Does using a capital asset approach mean that an assessment is unstructured?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Villing v. Husseni, 2016 BCCA 422 (CanLII):

Using the capital asset approach does not mean the assessment is unstructured. I agree with Garson J.A.’s observations in Morgan v. Galbraith, 2013 BCCA 305:

Other Questions


What is the appropriate capital asset approach to assessing damages for loss of capital assets? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing loss of capital asset under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a capital asset under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing loss of capacity under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing loss of earning capacity under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of the use of a capital asset approach in determining earnings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in relation to the use of the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used in assessing whether a plaintiff has suffered a loss or impairment of his capital asset, the ability to earn income? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper way to assess future loss of capital as a form of capital asset? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the use of income from a capital asset for family purposes constitute a family asset? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.