Can a court strike a pleading under Rule 129(1)(a) for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Zachry Energy International Inc. v. Sinopec Shanghai Engineering Co. Ltd., 2009 ABQB 265 (CanLII):

Rule 129(1)(a) allows the court to strike pleadings for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action. In determining whether such an application should be granted, the court will assume that the pleadings are proven and that it is plain and obvious that the pleading discloses no reasonable cause of action. (Hunt v. Carey Canada, 1990 CanLII 90 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959).

Other Questions


Is an application to strike out a pleading on the ground it does not disclose a cause of action an attack on the sufficiency of the pleading? (Alberta, Canada)
Is the pleading as amended to a Statement of Claim striking as disclosing no cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an application to strike a proceeding on the basis that it does not disclose a cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a party to an action extend the action by unilateral action, when nothing has been done to materially advance the action for five years or more? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for disclosing a reasonable cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
In a personal injury action, in what circumstances will the court award thrown away costs for failing to provide a 218.1 statement? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining an amount received by reason of action against an employer as a result of action taken against it? (Alberta, Canada)
Does third party notice disclose a cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a motion to strike have to be considered a cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.