How have the courts interpreted the principles of the BCSC/BCSC in cases involving cruise companies?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Animal Welfare International Inc. v. W3 International Media Ltd., 2014 BCSC 1839 (CanLII):
In Cruise Connections Canada v. Cancellieri, 2012 BCSC 53 at paras. 249-52, Mr. Justice Pearlman provided a useful summary of the applicable principles as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the principles of tortfeasor's law been interpreted in the context of the case law, and what are the principles with respect to animals generally? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the law of restitution against the taxing authority in the case of Empire? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has this been interpreted by this court in the context of perjury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of equalization in the context of the Rules of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a "deposit clause" in standard form contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the court order the division of shares in a company or interest in a trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a party who has not made full disclosure to a court has to prove to the court that there has been full disclosure? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the rule of common law in the context of personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
