What is the legal test for a claimant to argue for a particular alternative?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ontario Teacher Candi, 2021 ONSC 7386 (CanLII):
Although claimants will typically argue for particular alternatives, the burden remains on the government, and claimants do not necessarily need to definitely prove the effectiveness of proposed alternatives: Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 331, at para. 119.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a case generating a "very good but not extraordinary result" for a claimant receive a cost premium for a very good result for the claimant? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Minister have a legal duty to consider an application according to any particular process or time line? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for an equitable charge or lien against a claimant who has expended money on part of his land on faith that part of the land will be made over to the claimant? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for having a beneficiary be a child of full legal capacity? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the common law imply that real estate is sold in any particular state or is fit for any particular purpose? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for difference of opinion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for a Licensee who has been suspended from practising LSD while under suspension? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal burden of proving due execution, knowledge and approval and testamentary capacity in a will? (Ontario, Canada)
How strong a case of fraud is necessary to defeat a claim for legal professional privilege? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for a summary conviction? (Ontario, Canada)
