Canada relied on Cheslatta Carrier Nation v. British Columbia, 2000 BCCA 539, where a claimant group similarly sought a bare declaration of a right, in that case without asking for the court to rule on either infringement or justification. The court wrote at paras. 18-19: … such rights cannot be properly defined separately from the limitation of those rights. The latter are needed to refine and ultimately define the former ... … [The] definition of the circumstances in which infringement is justified is an important part of the process of defining the right itself.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.