The parties agreed that the prothonotary"s order is discretionary and that the judge hearing the appeal should not intervene unless the order is "clearly wrong in the sense that the exercise of discretion by the prothonotary was based upon a wrong principle or upon a misapprehension of the facts". This rule is set out in Canada v. Aqua-Gem Investments Ltd. , 1993 CanLII 2939 (FCA), [1993] 2 F.C. 425 (F.C.A.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.