What is the balance of convenience between the Respondent and Respondent?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Padda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 738 (CanLII):

As no serious issue has been demonstrated and no evidence of irreparable harm has been provided, the balance of convenience then favours the Respondent (Naseem v. Canada (Solicitor General), [1993] 68 F.T.R. 230, 43 A.C.W.S. (3d) 293).

Other Questions


Is there a difference between a responding officer responding to a 911 call and the responding officer who appears in response to the 911 call? ("New York", United States of America)
What is the balance of convenience between a plaintiff and the respondent in a personal injury case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of Respondent's failure to respond to Appeal 2095? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the balance of convenience with respect to a removal order? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for establishing a balance of convenience in the favour of an applicant? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the balance of convenience between the applicant and the judge? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What factors will be considered in the balance of convenience assessment of an interlocutory injunction? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the impact of an agreement between the respondent and the respondent on the relationship between the parties? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a prosecutor respond to a defense summation by responding to the summation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the balance of convenience favours the Minister for Health and Social Development when it comes to deciding whether to appoint a Minister of Health or Social Development in a medical malpractice case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.