Does a judge in chambers agree with the position of the Attorney General of Canada when it comes to the issue of same sex marriage?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Thailand v. Saxena, 2006 BCCA 147 (CanLII):
However, in Maydak v. Canada (Attorney General) (2004), 185 C.C.C. (3d) 559, 2004 BCCA 164, a judge in chambers made comments which appear to support the position taken by the Attorney General.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a chambers judge's decision not to refer the matter to the Registrar rather than the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court of Canada strike down Greenpeace’s application for an interim injunction against the Attorney General of Canada? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a common issue or issue be tried in advance of individual issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a vexatious claim against the Attorney General of Canada be struck from their pleadings? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge or quasi-judicial body be able to exercise the authority of the Court of Appeal in the context of sanctions imposed on the Attorney General? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a relator action be commenced against the Attorney General of Canada? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to issue a regulation which abrogates common law rights to justice and fairness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of the Attorney General’s position on constitutional pronouncements? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons for judgment of the chambers judge in chambers striking a plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
