Can evidence of a witness's involvement in prostitution be excluded at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Campbell, 76 Cal.App.4th 305, 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 315 (Cal. App. 1999):

Under Evidence Code section 352, a trial court has substantial discretion to exclude evidence of a witness's involvement in prostitution, particularly where the evidence is introduced solely for impeachment. (People v. Phillips (1985) 41 Cal.3d 29, 49-50; People v. Hayes (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 1238, 1248.) The fact a witness may have previously engaged in prostitution has marginal relevance to the witness's credibility, and has "an obvious potential for embarrassing or unfairly discrediting the witness" and misleading the jury as to the true issues in the case. (People v. Hayes, supra, 3 Cal.App.4th at p. 1248.)

Other Questions


In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be denied a fair trial when relevant evidence is excluded from the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the power of the trial court to exclude evidence under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a reciprocal obligation to disclose all relevant evidence obtained before trial, including rebuttal evidence it intends to use at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a challenge to a trial court's choice to admit or exclude evidence under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.