Can cross-defendants claim attorney fees and costs under section 425.16, subdivision (c) of the California Anti-SLAPP Act?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Nop Mission LLC v. Franchising, A126352, No. 473750 (Cal. App. 2011):

As noted above, the court awarded attorney fees pursuant to section 425.16, subdivision (c) which provides in relevant part that a prevailing party on a special motion to strike "shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs." In light of our conclusion that the trial court erred in granting cross-defendants' anti-SLAPP motions, cross-defendants are not prevailing parties under section 425.16, subdivision (c). As a result, cross-defendants are not entitled to attorney fees and costs pursuant to that statute. (Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1137.)

Other Questions


Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between Section 667.5, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code and section 667, subdivision 5, of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a claimant bring a claim for damages against a public entity under section 946.6 of the California Claims Act for failing to act on a timely claim? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1170.1, subdivision (i) of the California Civil Code apply to subdivision (d) of Section 667.6? (California, United States of America)
What is the facial constitutionality of the section 17556 (d) of California Government Code 17556, subdivision (d), section 726 of the California Tax Code, providing that a local authority has authority to levy fees on behalf of a third party? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is section 28, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution harmonized with section I, article I, section 15 of the constitution with respect to self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
Does a prior conviction under section 666.5, subdivision 667, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to section 667.5? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.