The following excerpt is from Rose v. California, Case No.: 21-cv-0267-CAB-BGS (S.D. Cal. 2021):
individual 'in custody' for the purposes of a habeas attack upon it." Maleng, 290 U.S. at 490; see Feldman v. Perrill, 902 F.2d 1445, 1448 (9th Cir. 1990) (stating that an expired conviction cannot satisfy the "in custody" requirement).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.