Can an evidentiary hearing be used to resolve a dispute over the prison mailbox rule?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lee v. Lopez, F071134 (Cal. App. 2016):
128, subd. (a)(3); Butler v. State (Tenn. 2002) 92 S.W.3d 387, 390 [evidentiary hearings may be used to resolve disputes involving the prison mailbox rule].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant entitled to an evidentiary hearing to resolve factual disputes raised by a claim of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
Is there an evidentiary hearing to resolve a claim of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What are the evidentiary rulings of the trial court for abuse of evidentiary evidence? (California, United States of America)
What are the evidentiary rulings for abuse of evidentiary power? (California, United States of America)
Does the Miranda Rule apply when a defendant is removed from the prison population and questioned by police about unrelated crime occurring outside prison? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury be compelled to testify at a post-verdict evidentiary hearing regarding allegations of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant manipulate the rule of rule 31(d) to bypass the statutory certificate requirement under section 1237.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a court hold an evidentiary hearing when jury misconduct is alleged in a new trial motion? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant's request for reappointment of counsel for a preliminary hearing was rejected immediately before the preliminary hearing commenced, is such error harmless even under the beyond-the-reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
