Can an easement be implied under state law?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Palacios v. City of San Luis Obispo, 2d Civil No. B276395 (Cal. App. 2017):
Appellants claim that the City took their property by infringing on their easement for light, air and views. No such easement can be implied under state law. (Kennedy v. Burnap
Page 7
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing an implied easement on a parcel of land where there is no prior use of the easement? (California, United States of America)
Is there an implied easement or does there need to be an implied or explicit agreement between a plaintiff and the grantor to allow a temporary use of the land? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 25400 of the California Stock Exchange Act restrict out-of-state shareholders from selling shares in other states? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving a defendant's mental state of implied malice or conscious disregard? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the mental state of defendant in the context of his assault on a prison guard? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's statements imply that Counsel never stated whether a witness's statement was made in connection with the matter on which counsel represented her? (California, United States of America)
What is implied malice for the implied malice of a defendant in the second degree felony-murder doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the art of the state-of-the-art defense in the failure to warn? (California, United States of America)
Does the withholding of voluntary intoxication evidence to negate the mental state of arsonist negate his mental state? (California, United States of America)
Does the implied threat of violence in the context of possession of knives and firearms constitute an implied threat to violence? (California, United States of America)
