Can an aider and abettor be held criminally responsible for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Salcido, E072629 (Cal. App. 2020):

Previously, under the natural and probable consequences doctrine, an aider and abettor could "'be held criminally responsible . . . not only for the crime he or she intended to aid and abet (the target crime), but also for any other crime [nontarget crime] that is the "natural and probable consequence" of the target crime.' [Citation.] To find an aider and abettor guilty of a nontarget crime under the natural and probable consequences theory, the jury must find that the defendant aided and abetted the target crime, that a coparticipant in the target crime also committed a nontarget crime, and that this nontarget crime was a natural and probable consequence of the target crime the defendant aided and abetted. [Citation.]" (People v. Hardy (2018) 5 Cal.5th 56, 92.)

The natural and probable consequences doctrine did not apply to first degree murder (People v. Chiu, supra, 59 Cal.4th at pp. 166-167); an aider and abettor could not be guilty of first degree murder unless he or she personally deliberated, premeditated, and intended to kill. (Id. at p. 166.) However, it did apply to second degree murder. (Id. at pp. 165-166.)

Page 9

Other Questions


Can an aider and abettor be held criminally responsible for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the nature and probable consequences of the natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a charged crime a natural and probable consequence of the target crime if the charged crime was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
Can a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime be held criminally liable for any other crime that was a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Is an aider and abettor liable for any other crime that was a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an aider and abettor is liable for any other crime that was a "natural and probable consequence" of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an aider and abettor to be found guilty of a crime under the "natural and probable consequence" doctrine? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant convicted as an aider and abettor under a natural and probable consequences theory be found guilty of a lesser crime of second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.