Can activity that merely provide context be stricken under the anti-SLAPP statute?

What is the effect of a statute in Cross v. Cross providing that a person can sue for damages under a different type of tortfeasor's statute? (California, United States of America)

When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)

Is a member of a street gang who actively participates in any criminal street gang with knowledge that its members engage in criminal gang activity liable for criminal activity? (California, United States of America)

Does a claim arise from protected activity when that activity underlies or forms the basis for the anti-SLAPP statute? (California, United States of America)

Is a later, more specific statute controlling over an earlier statute, even though the later statute would by its terms cover the present situation? (California, United States of America)

When a section of the California Civil Code provides for construction of a statute, how do courts interpret the construction of the statute? (California, United States of America)

Are litigation activities protected activity within the meaning of the Anti-SLAPP statute? (California, United States of America)

How has the statute of limitations been interpreted in the context of Defendant's request for an extension of time to plead? (California, United States of America)

Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for admitting unadjudicated "other criminal activities" and evidence of criminal activity after the crime has been committed? (California, United States of America)