California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hostetler, F075386 (Cal. App. 2018):
"The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that '[n]o person ... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself ....' The high court has made clear that the meaning of this language cannot be divorced from the historical practices at which it was aimed, namely, the brutal inquisitorial methods of ' "putting the accused upon his oath and compelling him to answer questions designed to uncover uncharged offenses, without evidence from another source." ' [Citations.] ... [T]he amendment prohibits the direct or derivative criminal use against an individual of 'testimonial' communications of an incriminatory nature, obtained from the person under official compulsion." (People v. Low (2010) 49 Cal.4th 372, 389-390.)
It is, however, a "settled proposition that a person may be required to produce specific documents even though they contain incriminating assertions of fact or belief because the creation of those documents was not 'compelled' within the meaning of the privilege [against self-incrimination]." (United States v. Hubbell (2000) 530 U.S. 27, 35-36.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.