California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sauceda-Contreras, G041831 (Cal. App. 2012):
One well-recognized exigent circumstance is a fire. "Our decisions have recognized that a warrantless entry by criminal law enforcement officials may be legal when there is compelling need for official action and no time to secure a warrant. [Citations.] Similarly, in the regulatory field, our cases have recognized the importance of 'prompt inspections, even without a warrant, . . . in emergency situations.' [Citations.] A burning building clearly presents an exigency of sufficient proportions to render a warrantless entry 'reasonable.' Indeed, it would defy reason to suppose that firemen must secure a warrant or consent before entering a burning structure to put out the blaze." (Michigan v. Tyler (1978) 436 U.S. 499, 509.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.