Can a waiting time penalty be awarded without an express finding in the special verdict that the failure to pay was willful?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from SINGH v. SouthLAND STONE, B208620, No. BC350196 (Cal. App. 2010):

18. Defendants do not argue that a waiting time penalty cannot be awarded without an express finding in the special verdict that the failure to pay was willful. Instead, defendants, in their appellants' opening brief, apparently acknowledge that the failure to pay was willful and argue only that the failure to pay was justified. Defendants argue for the first time in their reply brief that there is no evidence that the failure to pay was willful. A reviewing court ordinarily should not consider an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief. (Reichardt v. Hoffman (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 754, 764-766.) Defendants have shown no reason for us to deviate from that rule here, so we will not consider the point.

Other Questions


If evidence supports the special-circumstance finding of lying in wait, does that necessarily support the first degree murder verdict based on the theory of lying-in-wait? (California, United States of America)
If evidence supports the special-circumstance finding of lying in wait, does that necessarily support the first degree murder verdict based on the theory of lying-in-wait? (California, United States of America)
Does the amendment to the lying-in-wait special circumstance in a murder case in which there is a distinction between the special circumstance and lying in-wait first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to object to a verdict form adding to count 2 in the multiple murder special circumstance sufficient to vacate his life without parole sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a defendant's special instruction in a first degree murder case and a special circumstance finding? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to return a sentence of life imprisonment without a parole if it finds that mitigation outweighs the death penalty? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to testify at the penalty phase an error not to instruct the jury to refrain from drawing any inference from the fact that defendant did not testify at penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning the penalty for failing to identify a "special circumstance" in a death penalty case? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to require a jury to make written findings during the penalty phase violate a defendant's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
In a penalty case, in what circumstances will the court allow the jury to instruct the jury on a defendant's failure to testify in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.