California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Moeller v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.4th 1124, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 317, 947 P.2d 279 (Cal. 1997):
Evidentiary privileges are creatures of statute. (Evid.Code, 911; Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 373, 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 330, 853 P.2d 496.) Consequently, whether a trustee can claim the attorney-client privilege, and thereby prevent discovery of confidential communications it has had with an attorney, depends upon statute. A "client" ordinarily has a privilege to refuse to disclose confidential communications the client has had with an attorney. (Evid.Code, 954.) For purposes of the attorney-client privilege, the term " 'client' means a person who, directly or through an authorized representative, consults a lawyer for the purpose of retaining the lawyer or securing legal service or advice from him in his professional capacity...." (Evid.Code, 951.) A trustee therefore can claim the attorney-client privilege if the trustee, qua trustee, has the power to become an attorney's client.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.