Can a third party judgment creditor bring a direct action against the insured under Insurance Code section 11580?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Andrade v. Jennings, 54 Cal.App.4th 307, 62 Cal.Rptr.2d 787 (Cal. App. 1997):

10 In Pruyn v. Agricultural Ins. Co., supra, 36 Cal.App.4th 500, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 295, the appellate court observed that for purposes of bringing a direct action against an insurer under Insurance Code section 11580, a third party judgment creditor must have a final judgment against the insured but "a number of cases have held that such judgment need not be based on a contested or adversarial trial, but may rest upon a default hearing held following a settlement [citations] or an uncontested trial where the insured settled with the claimant and thereafter presented no defense. [Citation.] These circumstances necessarily involve significant independent adjudicatory action by the court, thus mitigating the risk of a fraudulent or collusive settlement between an insured and the claimant. Final judgments entered under either of these circumstances are binding on the insurer which has wrongfully abandoned its insured and may be enforced directly under Insurance Code section 11580. [p] There is a sound reason why this should be so. The insurer not only had a right to participate in and to control the litigation, it had a duty to do so. An insurer which has wrongfully abandoned its insured should not be heard to complain or allowed to relitigate the trial court's judgment merely because the default or uncontested proceedings followed, and were related to, an agreement between the insured and the claimant. Whatever the terms of the settlement, the entry of judgment was based on an independent review and adjudication of the evidence by the trial court. An insurer which has breached its contract is properly bound by the result of such trial proceedings.... [Citation.]" (Id. at pp. 516-517, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 295.) However, the appellate court cautioned: "We exclude, of course, those trial proceedings which are clearly a patent sham collusively designed to create a judgment for which liability insurance coverage would then exist. [Citation.]" (Id. at p. 517, fn. 16, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 295.)

Other Questions


If the full credit bid rule is extended to bar fraud actions against third parties, can appellant bring an action against the third party? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under Insurance Code section 790.03 against an insurer for breach of the Insurance Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a third party claimant bring a direct action against an insurance company on the contract? (California, United States of America)
Does an insurer have to defend an insured in a third party action for copyright infringement arising from the display of a copy of a painting in the lobby of a building the insureds owned? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action, does the insurance company have standing to bring a motion to vacate judgment against the insured? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Can an independent insurance adjuster bring a cause of action for violation of Insurance Code section 790.03? (California, United States of America)
Is a party who transfers his interest in an action after the action has been commenced and before judgment the proper party to appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does an insurer have a right to control defense and settlement of the third party action against its insured? (California, United States of America)
Is a judgment that interferes with a party's ability to retain counsel an action that damages the debtor's attorney fees rather than the judgment creditors' liens? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.