Can a slight misstatement by a prosecutor be rendered harmless by the court's proper instruction to the jury?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bonadie, G050684 (Cal. App. 2015):
"A slight misstatement of law by a prosecutor can be rendered harmless by the court's proper instruction to the jury" (United States v. Mendoza (9th Cir. 2001) 244 F.3d 1037, 1045), but here the prosecutor incorrectly eliminated consideration of defendant's delusions on all but the issue of premeditation and deliberation, and defense counsel did not object. Indeed, defense counsel appeared to have the same
Page 26
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a jury have to consider whether a jury has been instructed to disregard an instruction from the Court of Appeal that is not supported by how the jury views the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
Is giving the instruction to the jury too late in the trial of a defendant a breach of the law, or does the court have a duty to properly instruct the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the written and oral versions of jury instructions in a jury trial and the written version of the instructions given to the jury? (California, United States of America)
When a jury asks a jury a question after retiring for deliberation, does the court have a duty to provide the jury with additional instructions? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's out-of-court statement is admitted to a jury, does the court have to instruct the jury that this evidence must be viewed with caution? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury need to be instructed in English as well as the language used by the court to instruct the jury in English? (California, United States of America)
What is the harmless error analysis that a reviewing court should use when a trial court's jury instructions incorrectly define an element of a charged offense? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury be instructed to follow the law as explained by the court, even if the attorney's comments are in conflict with the instructions given to the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
