Can a sentencing court rely on evidence from a separate trial for sentencing purposes?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Londres, 935 F.2d 276 (9th Cir. 1991):

The Government cites to Serapo v. United States, 595 F.2d 3 (9th Cir.1979), where we found a defendant's due process rights were not violated by the sentencing court's reliance on evidence in the trials of two codefendants. Serapo, however, is not directly controlling because the information which was challenged was presented in both the presentence report and the separate trial testimony. Id. at 4. Under governing pre-Sentencing Guidelines law, we therefore hold there is no bar to the sentencing court consideration of hearsay testimony from a separate trial as long as this information is not shown to be materially false or unreliable under the standard pronounced in Messer, 785 F.2d at 834. 3

2. Discussion

Other Questions


Can a sentencing court impose a restitutionary sentence on a defendant who is indigent at the time of sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a sentence for conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine need to be separated from a separate sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal district court exercise its discretionary sentencing authority by sentencing a defendant to a minimum sentence based on the Guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the sentencing packaging doctrine apply to a case where both a new sentence and a revocation sentence were imposed at the conclusion of a single sentencing proceeding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal court's evaluation of the reliability of evidence used for sentencing purposes reviewed for abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the argument that the court improperly attributed more weight to circumstantial evidence than to direct evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a court departs from the sentencing guidelines, does the court have to indicate a specific reason for the imposition of a sentence different than that described? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply in a motion to suppress evidence in a criminal trial in federal court when the evidence was solely the product of a state investigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court of appeals remand to a federal district court for resentencing where the sentence was imposed as a possible result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.