Can a prosecutor improperly characterize defense counsel's argument as a "ridiculous" attempt to obtain an acquittal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mendoza, A139901, A140431 (Cal. App. 2017):
generally establish prosecutorial misconduct"]; People v. Stitely (2005) 35 Cal.4th 514, 559-560 [no misconduct where prosecutor characterized defense counsel's argument as a "ridiculous" attempt to obtain an acquittal].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
Is it generally improper for a prosecutor to accuse defense counsel of fabricating a defense, or to imply that counsel is free to deceive the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a prosecutor to accuse a defense counsel of fabricating a defense or imply that counsel is free to deceive the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Does the prosecutor's statement on rebuttal that defense counsel testified that there are no apartment complexes directly across from the Perezes improperly accused her counsel of testifying? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor impugently call the integrity of defense counsel by asserting defense counsel would lose their bar cards if they argued in favor of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
If a prosecutor has made a number of improper statements in their closing argument, would the defense counsel have been within the bounds of reasonable competence to respond with an objection? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor who described the defense case as "ludicrous," "contrived" and "bogus" in his arguments to the jury use improper or improper language? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor makes an argument that the prosecutor was aware of the facts to the jury in a death penalty case, is it improper or improper? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
