Can a prosecutor cross-examine a defendant's post-arrest silence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, B226370 (Cal. App. 2011):

Defendant claims the prosecutor's use of his post-arrest silence violates the rule set forth in Doyle v. Ohio, supra, 426 U.S. 610. In Doyle, the United States Supreme Court held that a prosecutor may not impeach a defendant's exculpatory version of events given for the first time at trial by cross-examining the defendant about his or her failure to have told police the story after receiving Miranda warnings.

Other Questions


Does a prosecutor improperly comment on a defendant's silence in their closing argument violate the Fifth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a claim that a prosecutor made improper racial references in the prosecutor's guilt phase argument to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a claim against a prosecutor for misconduct on appeal against the finding that the prosecutor made inappropriate comments about a change in the defense? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to damages if the prosecutor improperly commented upon defendant's failure to testify? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comment on a defendant's silence violate the Fifth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Is it a violation of due process and fundamental fairness to impeach a defendant's postarrest silence following a Miranda warning? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be permitted to use a defendant's statement at trial in breach of a prosecutor's promise not to do so? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.