California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Murillo, 179 Cal.Rptr.3d 891, 231 Cal.App.4th 448 (Cal. App. 2014):
This case is unlike People v. Morgain (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 454, 99 Cal.Rptr.3d 301 in which the prosecutor's five leading questions to a recalcitrant witness did not violate the defendant's right to confront witnesses. In Morgain, the defendant's girlfriend told police that he confessed to a shooting. At trial, the prosecutor granted her immunity. She answered a number of preliminary questions and when the prosecutor asked her about her pretrial statement, she affirmatively denied making it. Three times she answered "no" when
[179 Cal.Rptr.3d 898]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.