Can a prosecutor and defendant enter into a negotiated disposition that expressly recognizes or acknowledges a dispute or uncertainty about the trial court's authority to impose a maximum sentence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Shelton, 125 P.3d 290, 37 Cal.4th 759, 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 354 (Cal. 2006):

Of course, a prosecutor and a defendant may enter into a negotiated disposition that expressly recognizes a dispute or uncertainty about the trial court's authority to impose a specified maximum sentence because of Penal Code section 654's multiple punishment prohibition or for some other reason and preserves the defendant's right to raise that issue at sentencing and on appeal. (See People v. Panizzon, supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 78, fn. 8, 51 Cal.Rptr.2d 851, 913 P.2d 1061.) In that situation, the plea agreement's validity and enforceability would be unaffected by the ultimate resolution of the disputed issue

[37 Cal.Rptr.3d 360]

Other Questions


Can a defendant who entered into a plea bargain in return for a less lenient sentence at the appellate court challenge the sentence imposed by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure by defendant's trial attorney to object at his sentencing hearing after the trial court indicated that it would impose upper term sentences on count one and the enhancement? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who agrees to a specific sentence at trial be successful in appealing against the specific sentence imposed by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
When a judge's original sentencing has been struck down by the Court of Appeal, does the sentencing court have the power to impose any sentence permitted under the applicable statutes and rules on remand? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that the trial court erred by failing to expressly state its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's failure to provide a statement of reasons for sentencing a defendant to a sentence that would have changed the sentence? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have to remand the case for sentencing if the trial court errs in imposing a sentence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.