California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Adams v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 34 Cal.Rptr.2d 641, 8 Cal.4th 630, 882 P.2d 358 (Cal. 1994):
In professional license-revocation cases, involving revocation based upon conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, this court has considered the issue whether a license may be revoked on the basis of mere proof of conviction, without any consideration of the specific facts underlying the conviction. In these cases we have held: " 'Only if the minimum elements for a conviction necessarily involve moral turpitude and a conviction cannot be had without proof of facts showing moral turpitude, can the conviction be held to be of an offense involving moral turpitude.' " (Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners (1976) 16 Cal.3d 762, 766-767, 129 Cal.Rptr. 462, 548 P.2d 1134, quoting Lorenz v.
Page 657
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.