Can a plaintiff claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress without showing any physical injury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Wiggins, v. Royale Convalescent Hospital, 158 Cal.App.3d 914, 206 Cal.Rptr. 2 (Cal. App. 1984):

Similarly, the courts have allowed claims for emotional distress where the defendant's conduct is "extreme or outrageous" 4 or for "exceptional classes of cases where emotional suffering is a highly probable consequence of negligence or breach, primarily cases of corpse mishandling and negligently transmitted death notices." (Blackmer, Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals: Negligence Actions for Emotional Distress and Loss of Consortium without Physical Injury, supra, 69 Cal.L.Rev. 1142, 1153.)

The court in Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, supra, 27 Cal.3d 916, 167 Cal.Rptr. 831, 616 P.2d 813, held a separate cause of action may be stated for the negligent infliction of serious emotional distress without any showing of physical injury. "[T]he unqualified requirement of physical injury is no longer justifiable." (Id., at p. 928, 167 Cal.Rptr. 831, 616 P.2d 813.) "The essential question is one of proof; whether the plaintiff has suffered a serious and compensable injury ... is a matter of proof to be presented to the trier of fact. The screening of claims on this basis at the pleading stage is a usurpation of the jury's function." (Id., at pp. 929-930, emphasis added, 167 Cal.Rptr. 831, 616 P.2d 813.)

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the children of a plaintiff who received negligent services of an attorney be able to recover damages for negligently inflicted emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law that limits damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress to those who contemporaneously observe both the negligent act and the injury it causes? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff include the taxi fare incident as support for his negligent infliction of emotional distress claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim for emotional distress arising from an incident in which a patient suffered severe emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
Does the statement of the tort itself, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, bring emotional distress within the ambit of the interests protected by the tort? (California, United States of America)
Is negligent infliction of emotional distress an ordinary cause of action for negligence? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between negligent misrepresentation and negligent infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a doctor's claim that he has stated a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff bring a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.