Can a plaintiff bring a cross-complaint?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Anelle v. Tran, G042477, No. 07CC03564 (Cal. App. 2011):

A cross-complaint relates back and is timely if the original complaint was filed before the statute of limitations on the cross-complaint had run. "[A] cross-complaint need only be subject-matter related to the plaintiff's complaint i.e., arise out of the same occurrence... to relate back to the date of filing the complaint for statute of limitations purposes. [Citation.]" (Sidney v. Superior Court (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 710, 714.) There is no question that this was a compulsory cross-complaint it arose from the same contract at issue in plaintiffs' complaint, which was filed on March 5, 2007. Thus, the cross-complaint, although filed in September, related back to the date of the initial complaint and was not untimely.

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff in an inverse condemnation action bring a claim against the state for the costs of defending the action? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have standing to bring an action alleging that he was injured as a result of alleged price-fixing? (California, United States of America)
What causes of action can a plaintiff bring in a common law cause of action for emotional distress and wrongful discharge? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an inverse condemnation action against a governmental entity for damage caused to private property caused by a governmental action? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have standing to bring an action for a breach of section 1090 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a plaintiff to bring a personal injury action under a statutory change in the law governing personal injury actions? (California, United States of America)
What is the statute of limitations for a plaintiff to bring a medical malpractice action? (California, United States of America)
Are plaintiffs barred from bringing a claim against Shinefield for misrepresentation and concealment? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action against an attorney for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, interference with contract and unjust enrichment? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.