California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc., 109 Cal.App.3d 275, 167 Cal.Rptr. 164 (Cal. App. 1980):
It is not disputed that a plaintiff's right to request a dismissal under the conditions stated in that subsection is absolute; and when such a request is filed the dismissal is effective and the court has no jurisdiction to proceed in disregard of the dismissal. (Egly v. Superior Court (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 476, 86 Cal.Rptr. 18.) The issue here is whether the October 6, 1978, request was timely.
In Goldtree v. Spreckels (1902) 135 Cal. 666, 67 P. 1091, after a demurrer had been sustained to two causes of action in the complaint, and prior to trial on the third, the plaintiff filed a written request for a dismissal of the action, which the clerk entered. Defendant's attorneys objected. The trial court ruled that a trial had been had when the court sustained the general demurrer to the two causes of action. It therefore set aside plaintiff's dismissal and entered judgment for defendant on the first two causes of action. Plaintiff appealed from the order cancelling the dismissal, and from the judgment.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.