Can a motion for a new trial be denied by the Court of Appeal unless the Respondent agrees to a reduction in his award?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Tri-Delta Engineering, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 146 Cal.Rptr. 14, 80 Cal.App.3d 752 (Cal. App. 1978):

2 Upon appeal from a final judgment, an appellate court may review the propriety of an order denying a motion for new trial. (Code Civ.Proc., 906; Litvinuk v. Litvinuk (1945) 27 Cal.2d 38, 42, 162 P.2d 8.) Although the trial court actually granted appellants' motion for new trial "unless (respondent) agrees to a reduction in his award, . . . " respondent's subsequent consent amounted to a denial of the motion. (Code Civ.Proc., 662.5(b).)

Other Questions


Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for a new trial be appealed from the order denying defendant's motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion to modify a sentence in a personal injury case an unauthorized and unauthorized appeal from the order of the Superior Court of Appeal denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to dismiss one or both of appellant's prior strike convictions, can appellant appeal against the finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.